Showing posts with label Executive Committee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Executive Committee. Show all posts

Friday, October 22, 2010

Uncertainty hangs over World Cup hosting

The contest to host the 2018 and 2022 World Cups, due to be decided by soccer's governing body FIFA has been discredited and thrown into uncertainty by allegations of vote-selling.

Two members of FIFA's executive committee -- Amos Adamu of Nigeria and Reynald Temarii of Tahiti -- were provisionally suspended on Wednesday for 30 days by the ethics committee.

It is alleged they offered to sell their votes when approached by Sunday Times reporters posing as lobbyists for an American consortium.

FIFA general secretary Jerome Valcke said on Wednesday he expected the vote to go ahead on December 2, but the soccer's governing body will have to act quickly and decisively to ensure it does.

England and Russia are bidding to host the 2018 World Cup along with joint bids from Spain/Portugal and Belgium/Netherlands while Japan, South Korea, Qatar, United States and Australia are candidates for 2022.

Voting dilemma

Voting rights are restricted to the 24 members of the FIFA executive committee. This compares to more than 100 voting members when the International Olympic Committee chooses venues for the Summer and Winter Olympic games.

If Adamu and Temarii are expelled, it is unclear whether they would immediately be replaced -- FIFA statutes dictate that regional confederations choose the executive committee members -- or whether the vote would be reduced to 22.

Bidding nations may protest if the size of the already-small electoral college is reduced still further.

FIFA officials on Wednesday did not want to discuss either scenario, saying it was premature.

"I'm not a prophet," head of the ethics committee Claudio Sulser said. "It's hard for me to answer, it depends on the evidence that is brought forward."

Ethics committee

FIFA's ethics committee is relatively new, having been created in 2006. Its first chairman was former British athlete Sebastian Coe while Sulser is a lawyer and former Swiss soccer international.

One of its main briefs is to keep watch over the bid process for 2018 and 2022.

The committee said it would produce a final verdict on Temarii and Adamu by mid-November.

"I think we can take a decision before December2... probably between November 15 and 17," Sulser said.

Possible collusion

Two unnamed candidate nations will also be investigated for breaching rules on collusion.

FIFA has rules banning bidding nations from making agreements with each other, but collusion was something critics said could become a possibility when it was decided to choose two World Cup hosts at the same time.

The ultimate penalty could be disqualification of the offending bids, but FIFA on Wednesday were reluctant to discuss this possibility, saying there were numerous stages to pass before such a drastic measure might be taken.

Related Articles

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Strict punishment for illegal missionaries

Strict punishment for illegal missionaries

The Hoa Hao Buddhist Sect’s Central Executive Committee has asked the
authorities of the Mekong Delta City of Can Tho to strictly punish
siblings Dang Thanh Dinh and Dang Van Nghia for their illegal missionary
activities.


The opinionated and extremist
activities of Dinh, 42, and Nghia, 38, both now residing in Phuoc Thoi
ward, O Mon district of Can Tho City, and their disregard of the laws
were also announced at a press conference jointly held by the Can Tho
City Fatherland Front, the Religion Committee and relevant agencies in
Can Tho on August 23.


Earlier, on Feb. 27, 2010,
Can Tho city’s relevant agencies announced the legal violations of
Dinh and Nghia, who took advantage of religious titles to illegally
teach Hoa Hao Buddhism to seek profit and cause social security
disorder.


The Hoa Hao Buddhist Sect’s Executive
Committee of Phuoc Thoi ward confirmed in its document that Dinh and
Nghia are neither Hoa Hao Buddhist followers nor Hoa Hao dogmas
teachers.


However, both Dinh and Nghia declared
themselves Hoa Hao Buddhist followers and regularly held get-togethers
without permission on the seventh and eighth days every month to
illegally carry out missionary work, offer medical check-ups, and print
and distribute almost 20,000 CDs and cassette tapes with private
religious missionary content.


At the press
conference, Hoa Hao Buddhist followers voiced their support for Hoa Hao
Buddhism, recognised by the state since 1999 with the guideline, “For
religion, for the nation” and condemned Dinh and Nghia’s illegal
missionary work which has stirred up popularity.


They requested the State protect the genuineness of Hoa Hao
Buddhism and called on Hoa Hao Buddhist followers to be vigilant of
demagogic tones of ill elements who take advantage of religious freedom
and belief to make profits and cause disorder./.

Related Articles